国产麻豆精品视频-国产麻豆精品免费视频-国产麻豆精品免费密入口-国产麻豆精品高清在线播放-国产麻豆精品hdvideoss-国产麻豆精品

撥號18861759551

你的位置:首頁 > 技術文章 > 像素尺寸和光學元件

技術文章

像素尺寸和光學元件

技術文章

Pixel Sizes and Optics

Understanding the interplay between camera sensors and imaging lenses is a vital part of designing and implementing a machine vision system. The optimization of this relationship is often overlooked, and the impact that it can have on the overall resolution of the system is large. An improperly paired camera/lens combination could lead to wasted money on the imaging system. Unfortunay, determining which lens and camera to use in any application is not always an easy task: more camera sensors (and as a direct result, more lenses) continue to be designed and manufactured to take advantage of new manufacturing capabilities and drive performance up. These new sensors present a number of challenges for lenses to overcome, and make the correct camera to lens pairing less obvious.

The first challenge is that pixels continue to get smaller. While smaller pixels typically mean higher system-level resolution, this is not always the case once the optics utilized are taken into account. In a perfect world, with no diffraction or optical errors in a system, resolution would be based simply upon the size of a pixel and the size of the object that is being viewed (see our application noteObject Space Resolution for further explanation). To briefly summarize, as pixel size decreases, the resolution increases. This increase occurs as smaller objects can be fit onto smaller pixels and still be able to resolve the spacing between the objects, even as that spacing decreases. This is an oversimplified model of how a camera sensor detects objects, not taking noise or other parameters into account.

Lenses also have resolution specifications, but the basics are not quite as easy to understand as sensors since there is nothing quite as concrete as a pixel. However, there are two factors that ultimay determine the contrast reproduction (modulation transfer function, or MTF) of a particular object feature onto a pixel when imaged through a lens: diffraction and aberrational content. Diffraction will occur anytime light passes through an aperture, causing contrast reduction (more details in our application noimitations on Resolution and Contrast: The Airy Disk). Aberrations are errors that occur in every imaging lens that either blur or misplace image information depending on the type of aberration (more information on individual optical aberrations can be found in our application note How Aberrations Affect Machine Vision Lenses. With a fast lens (≤f/4), optical aberrations are most often the cause for a system departing from “perfect” as would be dictated by the diffraction limit; in most cases, lenses simply do not function at their theoretical cutoff frequency (ξCutoff), as dictated by Equation 1.

To relate this equation back to a camera sensor, as the frequency of pixels increases (pixel size goes down), contrast goes down - every lens will always follow this trend. However, this does not account for the real world hardware performance of a lens. How tightly a lens is toleranced and manufactured will also have an impact on the aberrational content of a lens and the real-world performance will differ from the nominal, as-designed performance. It can be difficult to approximate how a real world lens will perform based on nominal data, but tests in a lab can help determine if a particular lens and camera sensor are compatible.

One way to understand how a lens will perform with a certain sensor is to test its resolution with a USAF 1951 bar target. Bar targets are better for determining lens/sensor compatibility than star targets, as their features line up better with square (and rectangular) pixels. The following examples show test images taken with the same high resolution 50mm focal length lens and the same lighting conditions on three different camera sensors. Each image is then compared to the lens’s nominal, on-axis MTF curve (blue curve). Only the on-axis curve is used in this case because the region of interest where contrast was measured only covered a small portion of the center of the sensor. Figure 1 shows the performance of the 50mm lens when paired with a 1/2.5” ON Semiconductor MT9P031 with 2.2µm pixels, when at a magnification of 0.177X. Using Equation 1 from our application note Resolution, the sensor’s Nyquist resolution is 227.7 lp/mm, meaning that the smallest object that the system could theoretically image when at a magnification of 0.177X is 12.4µm (using an alternate form of Equation 7 from our application note Resolution).

Keep in mind that these calculations have no contrast value associated with them. The left side of Figure 1 shows the images of two elements on a USAF 1951 target; the image shows two pixels per feature, and the bottom image shows one pixel per feature. At the Nyquist frequency of the sensor (227 lp/mm), the system images the target with 8.8% contrast, which is below the recommended 20% minimum contrast for a reliable imaging system. Note that by increasing the feature size by a factor of two to 24.8μm, the contrast is increased by nearly a factor of three. In a practical sense, the imaging system would be much more reliable at half the Nyquist frequency.

Figure 1: Comparison nominal lens performance vs. real-world performance for a high resolution 50mm lens on the ON Semiconductor MT9P031 with 2.2µm pixels. The red line shows the Nyquist limit of the sensor and the yellow line shows half of the Nyquist limit.

 

The conclusion that the imaging system could not reliably image an object feature that is 12.4µm in size is in direct opposition to what the equations in our application note Resolution show, as mathematically the objects fall within the capabilities of the system. This contradiction highlights that first order calculations and approximations are not enough to determine whether or not an imaging system can achieve a particular resolution. Additionally, a Nyquist frequency calculation is not a solid metric on which to lay the foundation of the resolution capabilities of a system, and should only be used as a guideline of the limitations that a system will have. A contrast of 8.8% is too low to be considered accurate since minor fluctuations in conditions could easily drive contrast down to unresolvable levels.

 

Figures 2 and 3 show similar images to those in Figure 1 though the sensors used were the Sony ICX655 (3.45µm pixels) and ON Semiconductor KAI-4021 (7.4µm pixels). The images in each figure show two pixels per feature and the bottom images show one pixel per feature. The major difference between the three Figures is that all of the image contrasts for Figures 2 and 3 are above 20%, meaning (at first glance) that they would be reliable at resolving features of that size. Of course, the minimum sized objects they can resolve are larger when compared to the 2.2µm pixels in Figure 1. However, imaging at the Nyquist frequency is still ill-advised as slight movements in the object could shift the desired feature between two pixels, making the object unresolvable. Note that as the pixel sizes increase from 2.2µm, to 3.45µm, to 7.4µm, the respective increases in contrast from one pixel per feature to two pixels per feature are less impactful. On the ICX655 (3.45µm pixels), the contrast changes by just under a factor of 2; this effect is further diminished with the KAI-4021 (7.4µm pixels).

Figure 2: Comparison nominal lens performance vs. real-world performance for a high resolution 50mm lens on the Sony ICX655 with 3.45µm pixels. The dark blue line shows the Nyquist limit of the sensor, and the light blue line shows half of the Nyquist limit.

Figure 3: Comparison nominal lens performance vs. real-world performance for a high resolution 50mm lens on the ON Semiconductor KAI-4021 with 7.4µm pixels. The dark green line shows the Nyquist limit of the sensor, and the light green line shows half of the Nyquist limit.

 

An important discrepancy in Figures 1, 2, and 3 is the difference between the nominal lens MTF and the real-world contrast in an actual image. The MTF curve of the lens on the right side of Figure 1 shows that the lens should achieve approximay 24% contrast at the frequency of 227 lp/mm, when the contrast value produced was 8.8%. There are two main contributors to this difference: sensor MTF and lens tolerances. Most sensor companies do not publish MTF curves for their sensors, but they have the same general shape that the lens has. Since system-level MTF is a product of the MTFs of all of the components of a system, the lens and the sensor MTFs must be multiplied together to provide a more accurate conclusion of the overall resolution capabilities of a system. As mentioned above, a toleranced MTF of a lens is also a departure from the nominal. All of these factors combine to change the expected resolution of a system, and on its own, a lens MTF curve is not an accurate representation of system-level resolution.

 

As seen in the images in Figure 4, the best system-level contrast is in the images taken with the larger pixels. As the pixel size decreases, the contrast drops considerably. A good best practice is to use 20% as a minimum contrast in a machine vision system, as any contrast value below that is too susceptible to fluctuations in noise coming from temperature variations or crosstalk in illumination. The image taken with the 50mm lens and the 2.2µm pixel in Figure 1 has a contrast of 8.8% and is too low to rely on the image data for object feature sizes corresponding to the 2.2µm pixel size because the lens is on the brink of becoming the limiting factor in the system. Sensors with pixels much smaller than 2.2µm certainly exist and are quite popular, but much below that size becomes nearly impossible for optics to resolve down to the individual pixel level. This means that the equations described in our application note Resolution become functionally meaningless for helping to determine system-level resolution, and images similar to those taken in the aforementioned figures would be impossible to capture. However, these tiny pixels still have a use - just because optics cannot resolve the entire pixel does not render them useless. For certain algorithms, such as blob analysis or optical character recognition (OCR), it is less about whether the lens can actually resolve down to the individual pixel level and more about how many pixels can be placed over a particular feature. With smaller pixels subpixel interpolation can be avoided, which will add to the accuracy of any measurement done with it. Additionally, there is less of a penalty in terms of resolution loss when switching to a color camera with a Bayer pattern filter.

Figure 4: Images taken with the same lens and lighting conditions on three different camera sensors with three different pixel sizes. The images are taken with four pixels per feature, and the bottom images are taken with two pixels per feature.

 

Another important point to remember is that jumping from one pixel per feature to two pixels per feature gives a substantial amount of contrast back, particularly on the smaller pixels. Although by halving the frequency, the minimum resolvable object effectively doubles in size. If it is absoluy necessary to view down to the single pixel level, it is often better to double the optics’ magnification and halve the field of view. This will cause the feature size to cover twice as many pixels and the contrast will be much higher. The downside to this solution is that less of the overall field will be visible. From the image sensor perspective, the best thing to do is to maintain the pixel size and double the format size of the image sensor. For example, an imaging system with a 1X magnification using a ½” sensor with a 2.2µm pixel will have the same field of view and spatial resolution as a 2X magnification system using a 1” sensor with a 2.2µm pixel, but with the 2X system, the contrast is theoretically doubled.

 

Unfortunay, doubling the sensor size creates additional problems for lenses. One of the major cost drivers of an imaging lens is the format size for which it was designed. Designing an objective lens for a larger format sensor takes more individual optical components; those components need to be larger and the tolerancing of the system needs to be tighter. Continuing from the example above, a lens designed for a 1” sensor may cost five times as much as a lens designed for a ½” sensor, even if it cannot hit the same pixel limited resolution specifications.

聯系我們

地址:江蘇省江陰市人民東路1091號1017室 傳真:0510-68836817 Email:sales@rympo.com
24小時在線客服,為您服務!

版權所有 © 2025 江陰韻翔光電技術有限公司 備案號:蘇ICP備16003332號-1 技術支持:化工儀器網 管理登陸 GoogleSitemap

在線咨詢
QQ客服
QQ:17041053
電話咨詢
0510-68836815
關注微信
77777欧美毛片777777| 小洞饿了要吃大肠动作视频| 色偷偷色噜噜狠狠网站30根| 亚洲欧美日韩久久精品| 成人免费看WWW网址入口| 久久久精品成人免费观看国产| 视频一区欧美日韩| 51被公侵犯玩弄漂亮人妻| 国语自产偷拍精品视频偷| 人妻少妇乱孑伦无码专区蜜柚| 亚洲美女又黄又爽在线观看| 国产精品久久久久影院亚瑟妓| 人妻大战黑人白浆狂泄| 中文字幕丝袜人妻制服丝袜在线| 狠狠色丁香久久综合| 少妇极品熟妇人妻| 拜托了老师动漫第二季| 免费看涩涩无遮挡的漫画| 亚洲人成网站在线播放2020| 国产一区二区三区不卡AV | 日本喷奶水中文字幕视频| 性欧美一区二区三区| 久久99热狠狠色精品一区| 亚洲AV秘 无码一区二区三密桃| 短裙公车被直接进入| 屁屁影院最新发布页CCYY| 主人调教下贱的烂货| 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区蜜芽| 小洁和公H文翁17| 国内精品久久久久久99蜜桃| 无码免费毛片手机在线无卡顿 | 国产精品日本一区二区不卡视频 | 久久国产精品99精品国产987| 亚洲伊人五月丁香激情| 精品久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 香草乱码一二三四区别| 国产高颜值大学生情侣酒店| 上边一面亲下边一面膜的功效 | 久久久午夜成人噜噜噜| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区应用 | 免费观看电视剧全集在线播放高清 | 成人人妻小说AV| 人妻无码一区二区三区免费视频 | 性少妇JEALOUSVUE片| 国产剧情MV天美传媒| 无码国产玉足脚交久久2020| 国产98在线 | 传媒麻豆| 色综合色欲色综合色综合色综合R| 国产成人亚洲综合网站小说| 天天狠天天透天干天天怕∴| 国产成人AV一区二区三区在线| 少妇性生生活视频在线观看| 国产女人好紧好爽| 小婷又紧又嫩又窄又多水| 精品人妻少妇一区二区三区夜夜嗨 | 国产真实伦在线观看| 亚洲香蕉成人AAAV在线网站 | 欧美精品少妇XXXXX喷水| AV人摸人人人澡人人超碰手机版 | 丰满岳跪趴高撅肥臀| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁| 好了AV第四综合无码久久| 亚洲国产欧美在线人成长黄瓜| 好紧好深好大乳无码中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕日产乱码高清APP| 女人高潮被爽到呻吟在线观看| EEUSS鲁片一区二区三区| 人妻人人澡人人添人人爽冫 一| 国99精品无码一区二区三区| 亚洲VA在线VA天堂VA无码| 精产国品一二三产区M553| 亚洲性啪啪无码AV天堂| 欧洲免费无码视频在线| 国产精品扒开腿做爽爽爽| 亚洲AV成人一区二区三区在线观| 激情 小说 亚洲 图片 伦 | 日韩AV一区在线观看| 国产98在线 | 传媒麻豆| 亚洲精品美女久久7777777| 久久久久人妻一区精品性色AV| JΑPΑN丰满人妻HDXXXX| 日本少妇人妻XXXXⅩ18| 国产99久9在线视频传媒| 亚洲精品无码aⅴ中文字幕蜜桃| 男女爽爽无遮挡免费视频| 把腿张开老子臊烂你多p晓晓| 香港三日本三级少妇三级2021| 狼人青草久久网伊人| A级毛片100部免费观看| 无码人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 久久伊人精品青青草原APP| 99久久夜色精品国产网站| 日文中字乱码一二三区别在哪| 国产精品宅男擼66M3U8| 永久免费无码国产| 欧美人与性囗牲恔配视频| 国产乱码精品一品二品| 中文天堂网在线最新版| 人妻仑乱A级毛片免费看| 国产亚洲精品精品国产亚洲综合| 亚洲综合久久一本久道| 欧美交换配乱吟粗大免费看| 丰满熟妇人妻中文字幕| 亚洲少妇吃奶摸下| 欧美成人免费影片区二区| 丰满性熟妇ⅩXXOOOZZX| 亚洲中文字幕乱码AV波多JI| 日日人人爽人人爽人人片AV| 久久精品国产亚洲AV果冻传媒| 99精品国产兔费观看久久| 少妇极品丰满人妻无码视频| 久久久亚洲熟妇熟女ⅩXXXHD| 成人片黄网站色大片免费| 亚洲欧美精品SUV| 日韩精品乱码AV一区二区| 久久精品人人做人人综合试看 | 国产乱子伦60女人的皮视频 | 欧洲多毛裸体XXXXX| 国产肥熟女视频一区二区三区| 在线永久免费观看黄网站| 日韩精品人妻一区二区三区| 久久国产精品亚洲艾草网| 大伊香蕉精品视频在线天堂| 小诗的公交车日记第9章| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品 | А√天堂资源地址在线| 小雪你的奶好大把腿张开| 欧美粗大强交18P直喷水| 韩国三级HD中文字幕| 成熟妇女性成熟满足视频| 亚洲成AV人片在线观看福利| 嫩草研究院久久久精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久电影网| 18禁亲胸揉胸膜下刺激免费网站| 天黑黑影院免费观看视频在线播放 | 久久精品国产亚洲AV麻豆甜| 国产DB624色谱柱36521| 亚洲一区二区三区波多野结衣| 熟女熟妇伦AV网站| 久久天天躁夜夜躁狠狠I女人| 成人亚洲区无码区在线点播| 岳今晚让我玩个够肥水一体探岳| 丝瓜草莓视频APP| 欧美国产亚洲日韩在线二区| 精品久久久久久狼人社区| 国产大片内射1区2区| A男人的天堂久久A毛片| 亚洲香蕉成人AV网站在线观看| 无码视频免费一区二区三区| 免费无码的AV片在线观看| 国产精品无圣光一区二区| 宝宝两根就哭男男是不是太早了 | 亚洲欧洲无码精品ⅤA| 无码国模大尺度视频在线观看| 人鲁交YAZHONGHUCXX| 美女扒开尿口让男人桶| 国产精品三级AV三级AV三级| 被医生吃奶吃高潮了H| 亚洲色成人网站WWW永久下载| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区夜夜嗨 | 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区喷水| 国产乱人伦中文无无码视频试看| 成人免费毛片内射美女-百度| 99国精产品灬源码1688钻石| 亚洲综合日韩久久成人AV| 性色AV一区二区三区人妻| 色欲A∨无码蜜臀AV免费播| 欧美性猛交XXX嘿人猛交| 狂野欧美性猛XXXX乱大交| 近親五十路六十被亲子中出| 国产精品天天看天天狠| 丰满妇女强高潮ⅩXXX| 拔萝卜视频免费观看高清下载| 中文字幕视频在线观看| 野花韩国在线观看免费版5| 亚洲成A人片在线观看无码| 无码AV动漫精品专区| 欧美熟妇的性裸交| 久久99国产精品久久99果冻传| 国产CHINASEX对白VID| 成人国产精品一区二区免费看 | 国产99视频精品免费视频6| 成年女人毛片视频免费| CAOPOREN超碰| 16—17女人毛片毛片| 岳打开双腿开始配合交换 | S货叫大声点C懒烂你的SBXS| 18禁成人黄网站免费观看| 曰批免费视频免费无码软件| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码APP | 99久久国产热无码精品免费| 中国XXXX真实偷拍| 岳妇伦丰满69ⅩⅩ| 一个吃我奶头两个舔我下面| 小莫骚麦歌曲播放MP3| 忘忧草在线影院WWW神马| 爽爽AV浪潮AV一区二区| 少妇饥渴偷公乱A级无码| 少妇伦子伦精品无码STYLES| 色 人 阁阁婷婷色五月破解|